28 January 2013

SOME OF THE MANY APPLICATIONS for which airships are safe, suitable, & sensible in addition to transportation of freight and passengers

1. Sporting event video coverage

2. Law enforcement: traffic surveillance and control; aerial views of traffic accidents;

3. Marine mammal population census and migration patterns

4. Design-and-Build surveys for planning & construction of bridges & roads --- carrying those first lines across the chasm.

5. Marine biology --- spotting red tides in coastal waters; monitoring the health of coral reefs

6. Fire fighting --- first-on-scene situation assessment in high rise fires, inaccessible areas, brush and forest fires, and involving hazardous materials

7. News organizations --- parades, ceremonies, sporting events, and in situations where danger to the news crew may exist

8. Radioactive and toxic waste sites --- photography & survey without risk

9. Geology --- Oil field exploration; survey and lava sample of volcanic eruptions

10. Federal & State Forest and Wildlife Services --- tree census; lumber poaching; game and fish poaching

11. Telecommunications --- surveying & designing fiber optic cable installations

12. Meteorological observations --- measuring wind speed, air pressure, air temperature, dew point, and humidity at various altitudes above ground level

13. Raising communications antennas to effective transmission altitudes during emergency situations

14. Fishing --- spotting big game fish for sport fishing, and schools of food fish for purse seining; seining schools of small fish and invertebrates visible from the air, for sale as bait

15. Monitoring railways, pipelines, and power lines --- a constant and ever- present requirement

16. Monitoring air pollutants for air quality standards determination

17. Agriculture --- Precision agriculture techniques using remote sensing technology to monitor crop moisture content; no-harm seeding from the air, in which the soil does not get compacted by heavy tractors, and therefore remains friable as a good seed bed

18. Archaeological site mapping; correlating aerial photographs with ground level excavations and discoveries

19. Commercial aerial photography for tourist and visitors’ bureaus, yacht brokers, school programs; realtors;

20. "Green" non-disruptive exploration of ecologically sensitive biospheres, such as rain forests and forest canopies

21. Lifting transmitting equipment into the sky for maximum range.

22. Radio antennas receiving and relaying Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) data from Ground Forces [military]

23. Long term recording in place by meteorological instruments    --- anemometers, humidity meters, thermometers, etc.

24. Air sampling for pollutants, particulates, insects, and pollen.

25. Acoustic sensors for detection of intruders, without the interference of loud noise from helicopter rotors and internal combustion engines

26. Radio relay and jamming for counter-insurgency purposes. [military]

27. Detecting of mines & other explosive devices [military and, for civilian use, detecting unexploded abandoned mines, a major cause of injuries to children in former war zones ]

28. Thermal imaging

29. Precise aiming of conventional ballistic weapons from a safe distance by Forward Artillery Observers [military]

30. Battlefield or distant control of ground forces [military]

31. Crowd control and detection devices [law enforcement]

CONCEIVED and COMPILED by HYBRID]  PELTA

 

26 January 2013

AIRSHIPS VERSUS AIRPLANES --- AN EARLY (1931) IMPARTIAL COMPARISON


Here is a copy of an interesting comparison in a book by Hugh Allen, published in 1931, whose thesis was the natural advantages and dominance of LTA airships over airplanes. It's an interesting twist on the usual criticisms hurled at airships. Quotes follow :
".... The airplane is a dynamic craft, deriving its lifting power from its velocity alone. The air pressure and suction on its wings give aerodynamic lift only as long as flying speed is maintained.
The airship is primarily aerostatic, that is its buoyancy arises from the fact that the lifting gas it contains is so much lighter than air that it will support, without other assistance, not only the balloon-like cells in which the gas is contained but the metal frame of the ship itself and the weight of crew, motors, fuel, and a pay load.
The airship continues to remain aloft even though its motors are shut off.
The airship, however, has an additional buoyancy, an aerodynamic lift resultant from motors and control surfaces.
[SO FAR, SO GOOD! Then the analysis and predictions start]
The airship and the airplane differ again in that the airplane is primarily a fast short distance craft, while the airship is slower and comes into its full efficiency only on long voyages, particularly across oceans.
The cruising speed of most transport or mail planes carrying a pay load is 100 to 120 miles an hour with a radius [RANGE] of about 500 miles. Though naturally a specially built or special purpose plane can fly faster and farther if pay load is replaced by fuel.
The airship, having a speed of 80 miles an hour and carrying ten tons of useful load, has been flown more than 6,000 miles in 69 hours with a comfortable fuel reserve at the end of the journey.
While the transatlantic flights of the R-34, the Los Angeles, the Graf Zeppelin and the R-100 have indicated transatlantic flying as a logical field for the airship, there will still be controversy as to whether the airplane may not challenge the airship here.
In discussing the subject before a meeting of the Society of Automotive Engineers in New York in May, 1930, former Commander J.C. Hunsaker, U.S.N., who had charge for the Navy of the design both of heavier-than-air craft and lighter-than-air craft during the war [WORLD WAR I] stated his belief that :
"All successful Atlantic airplane flights may fairly be discounted as having been made by overloaded planes, without payload, by abnormally courageous pilots, and in the most favorable summer weather that could be found. The unsuccessful airplane flights  give mute testimony that good luck cannot be depended on.
"We do know, however," he continued, "that the modern airplane can fly the Atlantic provided that one of several things does not happen. The things that must not happen re : first, persistent head winds causing exhaustion of fuel supply at sea; second, engine failure from any cause; third, loss of visibility with consequent loss of control and course; and fourth, failure of any structural part or function of lifting, stabilizing or control surfaces.
"Each of these contingencies may be fatal to the airplane, and in this I include the flying boat or seaplane in the North Atlantic, as its chance of survival there on the surface of the sea is at best precarious. In low latitudes both in the Pacific and Atlantic, the flying boat has a very fair chance to remain afloat,  but due to the infrequency of passing steamers many days may elapse before rescue. In general, a forced landing on the high seas cannot be tolerated by a commercial enterprise.
The chance of a forced landing at sea due to exhaustion of fuel is measured by the margin of fuel carried versus the weather to be expected. We know that even with an overloaded start and no pay load and with favorable weather there has been practically no margin for those airplanes that have successfully negotiated the eastward crossing of the North Atlantic.
We are building larger airplanes but their endurance unfortunately is not increasing... There are gains in aerodynamic and structural efficiency due to changes in design made possible by very large airplanes, yet the effect of such gains is largely absorbed in overcoming the relative weight increase due to size itself."
End of quote from book "The Story of the Airship"
[GEE, DO YOU THINK THAT THE AIRPLANE WILL EVER CATCH UP TO THE AIRSHIP --- THE EXPERT ENGINEER WHO WROTE THAT LITTLE PIECE IN 1931, QUOTED VERBATIM ABOVE, ASSURES US THAT IT COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAPPEN but it's certainly an interesting twist on the usual blather by the negative nattering anti-airship nabobs. ]

24 January 2013

FAILING THE AIRSHIP --- Public Education


Folks, we have failed the Airship !
How can that be ?  We have failed to get the true story of the Airship across, and with it the many lost opportunities to educate people about what it truly can do for us.

How do we know ? Three Signs :
IF the media still flash the terrifying image of the Hindenburg going down in flames at Lakehurst !

IF we still have folks cry out, almost in glee "Oh, the Humanity" every time that image appears ... and NOT just then. There was one poor Navy enlisted man working at an airship hangar who got a chorus of that phrase every time he walked across the hangar floor, from the (inevitable) gang of non-Airship Sailors .
If WE --- meaning the Collective Semi-Conscious --- can gasp at the thought of One Airship Accident, but barely glance at a picture of a helicopter accident . Unconvinced ? Here are the hard statistics :

Number of civil helicopter accidents ---- Total number of civil helicopter accidents between 2004 and 2008 ; SOURCE : Helicopter Annual 2009
 
        2004 --- 180

        2005  ---  93

        2006 --- 162

        2007 --- 175

        2008 --- 140

Total number of fatal helicopter accidents 33 26 25 23 29

        2004 ---   33

        2005 ---   26

        2006 ---   25

        2007 ---   23

        2008 ---   29

Total number of fatalities resulting from helicopter accidents

        2004 ---  68

        2005 ---  44

        2006 ---  43

        2007 ---  43

        2008 ---  75

Total number of serious injuries in helicopter accidents

        2004 ---  38

        2005 ---  44

        2006 ---  34

        2007 ---  34

        2008 ---  28

Pretty nasty statistics, wot ?!
We are put in mind of a quote from the Director of the Computer Center at a large university who commented about the time he spent in helicopters during his work for the U.S. Army : "During every flight, I could not help continually remembering that this chopper was manufactured by the Lowest Bidder on the contract".

Where have we Airship Enthusaiasts and Advocates failed ? By forgetting that the Medium is the Message, and that we have never placed any effort into teaching the public --- for that's what Public Relations is (are?) --- the many advantages, benefits, and the balanced true story of the Airship.

Advocacy, Education, Leadership ! That's a start !

Shame on us ! What can we do ? More to follow !
(signed)                                                                                        Hybrid Pelta

23 January 2013

LTA : MAKE IT WORK , MAKE IT PAY : A Financial Conference on Lighter-than Air Ventures


LTA --- GRIST FOR THE BLOG MILL ---  FINANCIAL CONFERENCES

This is a radical expansion and re-write of our previous BLOG of 23 January 2013 : The additional material is, if not priceless (too much to ask for) --- at least, we believe---  greatly value enhancing,
 
We don't know how many interested souls this will reach. That said, we would like to thank you all for your comments, and go on record --- reflecting a previous role as organizer and manager of university conferences during time in academia --- with the following thoughts to ponder :

The wisdom that comes from maturity (a nice term for aging), now suggests that a conference on the subject of lighter-than-air craft --- NOT the mechanics, NOT the history, and NOT negatives such as the cause of one-time 75-year-old disasters ---  but rather, as someone suggested recently, How to Make it Work : Follow the Money .

We believe that, given the financially-oriented structure of our civilization, it struck us that a national, or even international, conference bringing together manufacturers and operators of LTA equipment with interested investors and financial advisors in a forum entitled something like "LTA : Make it Work, Make it Pay" might be successful and beneficial to both cohorts.

Despite prevailing economic conditions, there's a good deal of capital available, as very few investors are willing to put their money out at the 0.5 % Return on Investment that we were quoted recently by our bank; investors may be interested in opportunities in the airship field, but find that airship manufacturers don't talk their language. In any case, it couldn't hurt to attempt the matchmaking.

We envision airship designers, manufacturers, and purveyors, both big and small, be given the opportunity to talk about and demonstrate their efforts and successes to venture capitalists and those financial groups who instruct and assist small companies in Private Placements under Section 504 of the SEC Regulations or, indeed, even full-bore Initial Public Offerings (IPO's) .
 
Let's say we choose a large open venue --- perhaps near an operating under-utilized airport (NOT an O'Hare or a Kennedy International) --- conveniently located near indoor exhibition space, perhaps close to a University with an engineering department that might wish to participate and an academic structure that encouraged the interchange of ideas. LTA airship demonstrations, forums providing sound financial advice, and even vending of airship-oriented accessories and supplies, it might warrant the effort.
 
Also present would be representatives of C.P.A. firms with an interest in New Business Development and small start-ups AND, especially, small firms engaged in the design and manufacture of remote sensing devices . So many small businessmen engaged in the LTA field think only about ferrying tourists around for a fee, in the tradition of the great Zeppelins of the past. Yet the two neglected areas of remote sensors and , possibly, cargo (freight) transportation might prove to be the two most financially rewarding aspects of the airship business, that turn failure into success.

We'd also encourage knowledgeable advisors to be available to analyze current Business Models and Business Plans --- two very distinct species of financial animal --- and to recommend beneficial changes to new businesses. We know of one recent case where  --- no matter how many trips the airship took, no matter how many tourist passengers booked hour-long sight-seeing passage --- the design of the tour and the income-expense math could not possibly succeed in earning any sort of a Return On Investment for the venture . Sadly, the business closed permanently and the airship had to be returned to the manufacturer.
 
Analogy ? Picture a taxicab business in New York City that advertised it would take you anywhere in New York State for $ 1.00 ; they would be doomed to lose money on every trip and a successful passenger load might actually represent a heavy drain on cash flow. One cannot remain in existence very long with that massive financial drain .

We would also like to see experts in marketing (much more than merely advertising) --- especially those well-versed in the new Social Media --- teach the airship owners about the myriad new ways that currently exist to get their airship venture known by potential public customers .

Those financial analyses and that up-to-date business advice from professionals would be the core of this conference, and I believe that it would be beneficial to airship entrepreneurs, investors, and the continued use of airships in continuing, profitable business ventures.

We also believe that the financial design of this project suggests that renting the use of airships, OR using the lease-purchase approach as automobile dealers have done, would be an interesting and useful addition to the program. Airship purveyors should realize that not many people can comfortably write a check for the entire price of an automobile ... OR in this case, an airship --- and that lease-purchase plans could be something for them to consider making available to entrepreneurs.

In order to minimize the effects of bad weather, we would plan a conference of that sort be held in the halcyon season of incredibly fine weather upon which one can depend that occurs regularly and predictably here on the Gulf Coast of Florida (Greater Tampa Bay) between --- roughly --- Thanksgiving and Easter. [Recent Canadian visitor : "Wow, it's beautiful down here. every day, perfect blue sky, no rain, no storms ! But tell me, what's Winter like down here ?"  Our response : "This is Winter down here" ]

Supplementary events featuring sophisticated remotely-operated large-scale miniature airships , for example, a one-fourth full size drone up to 30 foot long, capable of being equipped with a broad range of Remote Sensors that extend its function and practicability far beyond merely a hobby or a toy.

This event might not be the magnitude of the Super Bowl, but we imagine that it would attract a substantial number of people in the fields of airships and finance, together with a large controlled-access public audience that would provide a basis for viral publicity by the Mainstream Media, and would justify the effort.
 
Airship families could attend and, either see the program OR wander off to the beaches (finest in the world) or the many resort and theme park attractions within an hour or so.

We'd like to see many small airship businesses succeed under a variety of business arrangements. Knowledge is Power .

Whatcha think ? Please give us your thoughts by eMail at HNILS@MSN.COM We will read and reply to anything even remotely sincere.

HybridPelta

Palmetto-Ellenton Lighter-Than-Air Airships, Large and Small                                       
Harold Nils Pelta                                                     HNILS@msn.com

P O Box 208
Ellenton, FL 34222

REVIEWING PROGRAM POSSIBILITIES :

Discussion of design and construction concepts

Public offerings (IPO's)

Private Placements under §504 of the SEC Regulations

Remote sensing                                       

Power options --- Internal Combustion , Electricity, Fuel Cell,         other Fuel Options   
                                                                                                  Applications in a huge variety of fields, practical, research,                      and academic  
Marketing your LTA Airship Business --- Have you tried the new Social Media ?
Business Models, Business Plans - Constructing a Blueprint                                                                             for Success ?          
The Federal Aviation Administration --- Role and Restriction 

"Gee, I Never Thought of That" sessions     

COYOTE  Sessions (Call Off Your Old Tired Excuses OR                                               How to Respond to Naysayers)

Examining Instruction and Curricular Requirements for Flying LTA Airships ?  Do we still need to insist on new airship pilots learning to fly hot-air balloons first --- Isn't it rather like Motor Vehicle Agencies insisting you learn How to ride a horse, THEN How to drive a horse-drawn carriage BEFORE you even get into an automobile for your first driving lesson ? 

Are the new, exciting remotely-controlled Mini-Airships classified as model airplanes? ... OR as Drones?  OR as scientific instruments?  i... OR analogous to ROV's  (Robot submarines) ? OR ?????

Doesn't the banishment of pilots from the cockpit to a remote location remove the last barrier to the use of Hydrogen as fuel ? "It Won't Burn, But If It Does, No Harm Done, Just Collect The Insurance"

Oh, Right, The Insurance ! An important resource to have                 available.  
... and much more !     
Hybrid-Hal Pelta

Harold Nils Pelta
P O Box 208
Ellenton, FL 34222                                   
HNILS@msn.com